![]() ![]() You can always do both anyway, like, set up two input channels, one clean, one wet and then decide which one works best (This might be more cumbersome to set up in hardware than on a DAW). It also makes sense to use DSP on your artist's returns to influence their perfomance, pitch correction, compression and a slight reverb might make the artist feel they're sounding BIG and thus deliver more emotion on their takes. I do agree that baking it in is destructive and that it forces you to commit to what you've recorded to later on mix, but unless you're constantly second guessing yourself that's a nothing burger. Imagine you work with hardware for example, wouldn't it make sense to just slap on your 1176 on the way in if you were gonna use it with the same settings anyway? And maybe do some basic EQing to cut the lows on a vocal take since you'd do that later on too? Plus with hardware you spare yourself the time of having to re-record the unit's output later on when you do decide to run your signal through. When you really think about it, by recording wet you might be shaving off a full hour of work. The flipside of that coin is that recording wet you save time later down the line, so for a professional recording engineer who's accustomed to using the same compression settings for example it might make sense to just save themselves the time and bake that compression on the way in, same goes for wide tonal EQing and slight saturation. Instead of tracking both, and then adding tons of eq to the kick, and now your bass is fighting it.īecause I’ve been taught that you always want to record tracks as clean and dry as possible so you’re not limiting your mix later on by having to work with wavs that already have printed effects Seriously, how much time have you spent trying to get a bass and kick to work together that wouldn’t be necessary if your kick sound was solid when you tracked bass. Also, for me personally mixing became a lot easier when I started getting what I wanted when tracking. I can’t tell you how much time I’ve wasted over the years trying to make something unnecessary work. If I want the sound of an amp and di on bass, or multiple mics on a guitar amp, I’ll do it, but if a bass amp, or a single guitar mic is giving me what I want, I would rather commit to that than record a bunch of stuff to wade through later. ![]() For the same reason I don’t like to capture unnecessary tracks. I use hardware not plugins, so my experience is a bit different, but there are some advantages to processing on the way in that apply either way. Download Audacity Latest version : 3.3.3 View Release Notes Documentation Audacity Posts Audacity 3. I think the idea of not committing on the way in is good when you are green, and might be doing more harm than good., but there is a point when you are confident it can be useful. Audacity is an easy-to-use, multi-track audio editor and recorder for Windows, macOS, GNU/Linux and other operating systems.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |